India passed, between Parliament and the Supreme Court.
- Abhilasha Bhrambhatt
- Apr 19, 2018
- 3 min read
India is successfully failing, to achieve designed chaos. The ideological strife has constipated the structured institutions, responsible for running the India as, “Republic”. The designed bows had succeeded in aiming arrows towards these institutions turning them into morphed one to remain dysfunctional at needs. The aspect which frightens the most is its successful penetration into perception building, where the crowd has believed the repeated lies of myths. Instead of anger, the aware section of Indian society is either taking the route of resigning from it or bewildering long sighs of apathy, leading to a gradual but popular acceptance of democracy failure in the Indian society.
In every telecasted debate, whether from parliament or media studios, the kinds of hate bashing are repeated, execution of a same scripts depicting “blame on the other”, is executed from all the polity. This has serene the spirit democracy. Every party has its fan base, worried about the 2019 elections, whether the Prime Minister Narendra Modi will retain the majority. The focus of our elections has lost its real or virtual objectives, its dependence on the politics of famous is eroding it at large.
The unprecedented step by Modi government to make its MPs fast for a day as a mark of protest, against the opposition is a fascinating and innovative (something other than charge trading) attempt to convince people that it’s not BJP to be blamed for the impasse in the Parliament. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has become the first PM to adopt such political tactics for convincing citizenry against the evident in parliament as regular failure.
As the Indian media is busy propagating its new “biased behavior”, in the consequence of so we are left to accept that, the elections are to be the result of Parliament and Supreme Court, the ultimate legislatures of India.
But, as it was never made popular to see Parliament as the supreme forum for debate and discussion, its objectives were made to be confined to a 5 marks answer in the political science paper, which might even get leaked.
Had it been taught to be concerned about the discussions going on in Parliament, it would have been difficult to get the Budget pass without any discussions.
The designed shift in the conscience of people has diminished the stature of Parliament in the life of the nation. The absence of discussion over parliamentary sessions is sine qua non to people having given up on parliament. As the Parliament has lost its recognition as debate forum, similarly the social platforms and media studios are losing it, what is getting enriched is intolerance and presupposition for coming “Achhe din”.
The political parties are aware about the perceptive of Parliament, which has led the debate to open ground or media cubic, where no one can hold them liable for their tweets, statement, efficiency in office or lost morality in statements. This TRP gaining cesarean has increased the gap between people and parliament.
Where the people have given up on Parliament, Parliament has lost its power to substantiate the trust of the mandate crowned to each MP.
On the other hand, is the Supreme Court, it’s losing glory as apex institution is alarming. The Supreme court had worked as Constitution court. The inscribed values in preamble of Indian constitution as fraternity, secular, and social had been executed and reserved by the Supreme Court in the society. The stature of the Supreme Court is not reserved but earned by senior judiciary of the apex institution.
The emerged doubts over the impartiality of recently given judgments, is making people to resign from trusting the stature of the Supreme Court. The divide among judges and the divide between citizens over the assignment of cases and judgments respectively, are required to be scrutinized.
The situation has wearied and is attempting the slow murder of democracy under the tempting shallow powers of polarisation. The people are required to attain the position of lost critics and rational debaters of the present rather past to preserve the future.
Comments